var length = 10000000
var data = [];
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) data.push(i);
data.map((val) => val * val);
var zzz = []; for (var e of data) zzz.push(e * e);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
map | |
for push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
map | 1.4 Ops/sec |
for push | 2.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches to perform an array operation on a large dataset:
Array.prototype.map()
methodArray.prototype.push()
methodOptions Compared
map()
vs for push
(manual loop)Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
map()
Method:for push
(Manual Loop) Method:Library Used:
The map()
method uses the Array.prototype object, which is a part of the JavaScript Standard Library. It provides a way to perform an operation on each element of an array without modifying the original array.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two different approaches to performing an array operation.
Other Alternatives:
forEach()
method: This approach would be similar to the for push
method, but with a more concise syntax.reduce()
method: This approach would be suitable for calculating aggregate values from the array elements.filter()
method: This approach would be suitable for filtering out certain elements from the array.Benchmark Preparation Code Explanation:
The preparation code creates an array of 10 million elements, each with a value from 0 to 9.999999999 (to avoid floating-point precision issues). The code then pushes these values into another array using the for push
method.
Individual Test Cases:
Each test case measures the execution time of one approach:
map()
Method: Measures the execution time of the data.map((val) => val * val)
expression.for push
(Manual Loop) Method: Measures the execution time of the var zzz = []; for (var e of data) zzz.push(e * e);
code.The benchmark uses two test cases: one for each approach, with identical input data and execution context.