<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="test">Test</div>
var el = document.getElementById("test");
window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {
console.log(el)
})
var el = document.getElementById("test");
$(window).on('scroll', function() {
console.log(el)
})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Vanilla JS | |
Jquery |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Vanilla JS | 1354.0 Ops/sec |
Jquery | 277006.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition: The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript approaches for DOM manipulation: Vanilla JavaScript (without any libraries) and jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation.
Options Compared:
document.getElementById
and logs its value on every scroll event.$
(the dollar sign) to select elements and .on()
to attach event listeners.Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
Library (jQuery): jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation by providing a simple, consistent way to select elements and attach event listeners. Its functions are optimized for performance and ease of use.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
The benchmark uses the console.log
function to output logging data, which is not specific to any particular JavaScript version or syntax.
Other Alternatives:
In summary, the benchmark compares the performance of Vanilla JavaScript (native DOM interaction) against jQuery (a popular library for DOM manipulation). The results will help users understand the trade-offs between using a native approach versus leveraging an established library like jQuery.