Benchmark: JS BigInt big number performance v2

Script Preparation code:

var bigInt1 = 1000000n
var bigInt2 = 50n
var number1 = 1000000
var number2 = 50

Tests:

BigInt
a = bigInt1 b = bigInt2 c = a - b c = a % b c = a * b c = a + b c = a ** b
Number
a = number1 b = number2 c = a - b c = a % b c = a * b c = a + b c = a ** b

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
BigInt
Number

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two data types: `Number` and `BigInt`. Specifically, it measures the execution time of various arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation) on both data types for large numbers.

**Options compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Number**: The traditional JavaScript number type.
2. **BigInt**: A relatively new data type introduced in ECMAScript 2020, designed to support arbitrary-precision integers.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **Number**:
	+ Pros:
		- Wide browser support
		- Simple implementation (no need for additional libraries)
	+ Cons:
		- Limited precision, which can lead to rounding errors and performance issues with very large numbers.
		- May exhibit slower performance due to the need for approximation or rounding.
* **BigInt**:
	+ Pros:
		- Arbitrary-precision support, eliminating rounding errors and potential performance bottlenecks.
		- Designed specifically for high-performance arithmetic operations on large integers.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires support from modern browsers (Chrome 129 and above) and engines (e.g., V8 in Chrome).
		- May require additional libraries or workarounds for older browsers.

**Library usage**

The benchmark uses the `BigInt` library to create and manipulate `BigInt` values. However, since this is a built-in JavaScript feature starting from ECMAScript 2020, no external library is necessary.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

The test cases utilize the `n` suffix for BigInt literals, introduced in ECMAScript 2019. This allows you to create arbitrary-precision integers without needing additional libraries or workarounds.

**Other alternatives**

If a browser does not support `BigInt`, you might consider using:

1. Third-party libraries like `big.js` or `decimal.js` that provide similar arithmetic capabilities.
2. Other data types, such as strings or arrays of integers, for smaller numbers.
3. Using a different language or runtime environment that supports arbitrary-precision integers.

Keep in mind that each alternative has its own trade-offs and requirements, so the choice depends on your specific use case and constraints.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 hours ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
BigInt	148399.4 Ops/sec
Number	235406.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JS BigInt big number performance v2 (version: 0)

Compare Number vs BigInt for big numbers

Comparing performance of: BigInt vs Number

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

BigInt

Number

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):