<div id="1"></div>
<div id="2"></div>
<div id="3"></div>
<div id="4"></div>
<div id="5"></div>
<div id="6"></div>
<div id="7"></div>
<div id="8"></div>
<div id="9"></div>
<div id="10"></div>
const el = document.getElementById('1');
let arr = [el];
arr.forEach(item => function() { item.textContent = 'a'; })
const el = document.getElementById('1');
el.textContent = 'a';
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Foreach 1 | |
Without Foreach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Foreach 1 | 4311707.5 Ops/sec |
Without Foreach | 2628804.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is created using MeasureThat.net, which allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark defines two test cases:
forEach
loop and not using forEach
.forEach
loop.Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code creates a simple HTML page with 10 <div>
elements, each identified by an ID from 1 to 10. This setup serves as a container for the benchmarked code.
Individual Test Cases
There are two individual test cases:
forEach
loop to iterate over an array containing one element, which is a reference to the first <div>
element on the page.<div>
element on the page.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two options:
forEach
loop: This approach uses an array containing one element, which is a reference to the DOM node.forEach
loop: This approach directly updates the text content of the DOM node without using a loop.Pros and Cons
Using forEach
loop:
Pros:
Cons:
Not using forEach
loop:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Syntax
In this benchmark, there is no specific library being used. However, the use of forEach
loop suggests that it's a standard JavaScript feature.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison between two basic approaches to updating DOM nodes.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare the performance of other approaches, here are some alternatives:
for
loop instead of forEach
map()
or reduce()
Keep in mind that each alternative will have its own set of pros and cons, and the best approach depends on the specific use case and requirements.