<div class="test"></div>
document.getElementsByClassName('test');
document.querySelectorAll('.test');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementsByClassName | |
querySelectorAll |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementsByClassName | 2696336.8 Ops/sec |
querySelectorAll | 1226101.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The test compares two approaches to select elements in an HTML document:
document.getElementsByClassName('test')
document.querySelectorAll('.test')
Both methods are used to retrieve a list of elements with a specific class attribute, in this case, 'test'
.
Options compared:
There are two options being compared:
getElementsByClassName
querySelectorAll
.test
).getElementsByClassName
, querySelectorAll
does not cache the results.Pros and Cons:
querySelectorAll
.Library usage:
Neither getElementsByClassName
nor querySelectorAll
uses a specific library. However, if we look at the HTML preparation code, <div class="test"></div>
, it's using a CSS class attribute to specify the selector. This is a built-in feature of HTML and CSS, not a library.
Special JS features or syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. Both methods use standard DOM APIs.
Other alternatives:
For more complex scenarios, other methods may be used:
document.querySelector()
: This method is similar to querySelectorAll
, but it only returns the first element that matches the selector.document.querySelectorAll('*')
: This method returns a NodeList of all elements in the document, regardless of class name or CSS selector.In summary, this benchmark compares two common DOM methods for selecting elements based on their class attribute: getElementsByClassName
and querySelectorAll
. The results can help developers understand the performance differences between these approaches in different browsers.