Benchmark: isOrIn alternatives

isOrIn alternatives (version: 0)

Testing different methods of checking whether an element is or is in another element. Start from the position where you have jquery objects. Make === or parentNodes a function call. Check that alternatives return the correct answer.

Comparing performance of: is() or contains() vs == or contains() vs !!closest.length vs == and parentNodes

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

//Add 100,000 elements
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
for (var i=0; i<10; i++){
  var outDiv = document.createElement('div');
  for (var j=0; j<100; j++){
    var midDiv = document.createElement('div');
    for (var k=0; k<100; k++){
      var inDiv = document.createElement('div');
      if(i==6 && j==60){
        if(k==60)
          inDiv.id="one";
        else if(k==61)
          inDiv.id="two";
      }
      midDiv.appendChild(inDiv)
    }
    outDiv.appendChild(midDiv)
  }
  frag.appendChild(outDiv);
}
document.body.appendChild(frag);
var $innerOne = $(document.getElementById('one'));
var $body = $(document.body)
var isOrIn = function isOrIn(container, contained){
  var found = false;
  if(!container || !contained){
  }else if(contained===container){
   found=true;
  } else{
    var pointer = contained;
    var parent = pointer.parentNode;

    while(parent && pointer!==container){
      if(parent === container){
          found=true;
          break;
      }
      pointer = parent;
      parent = pointer.parentNode;
    }

  }
  return found;
}

Tests:

is() or contains()
var found = $body.is($innerOne) || $.contains($body[0],$innerOne[0]); if(!found)throw new Error('BOOM');
== or contains()
var body = $body[0]; var innerOne = $innerOne[0]; var found = body==innerOne || $.contains(body,innerOne); if(!found)throw new Error('BOOM');
!!closest.length
var found = !!$innerOne.closest($body).length; if(!found)throw new Error('BOOM');
== and parentNodes
var found = isOrIn($body[0],$innerOne[0]); if(!found)throw new Error('BOOM');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
is() or contains()
== or contains()
!!closest.length
== and parentNodes

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its options.

**Benchmark Description**

The benchmark tests different methods for checking whether an element is or is contained within another element. The test starts with jQuery objects and uses `===` (strict equality) or `parentNodes` as function calls to check the relationship between elements.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares four different approaches:

1. **`is()` method**: A built-in jQuery method that checks if an element is contained within another element.
2. **`.contains()` method**: Another jQuery method, now deprecated in favor of `includes()` (more on this later), but still supported for backward compatibility.
3. **Element equality using `===`**: Directly comparing two elements using the strict equality operator (`===`).
4. **Using `.closest()` method**: A jQuery method that finds the closest ancestor element containing a given element.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`is()` method**:
	* Pros: Fast, efficient, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not work as expected in certain scenarios, such as when using `display: none` or `visibility: hidden`.
2. **`.contains()` method**:
	* Pros: Simple to use and well-documented.
	* Cons: Now deprecated, may not work with newer browsers, and can be slower than other methods.
3. **Element equality using `===`**:
	* Pros: Fast and efficient, but requires careful consideration of element relationships.
	* Cons: May not work as expected in certain scenarios, such as when elements are dynamically created or modified.
4. **Using `.closest()` method**:
	* Pros: Convenient and easy to use, especially for finding the closest ancestor element.
	* Cons: May be slower than other methods due to the traversal of DOM nodes.

**Library and Its Purpose**

The benchmark uses jQuery, a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. jQuery provides various methods, including `is()`, `.contains()`, and `.closest()`, which are used in the benchmark to compare different approaches for checking element relationships.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

None of the benchmark options use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's already explained.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/118.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/118.0.2088.76

Browser/OS: Chrome 118 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
is() or contains()	2832116.5 Ops/sec
== or contains()	5409927.5 Ops/sec
!!closest.length	1617074.8 Ops/sec
== and parentNodes	7420063.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

isOrIn alternatives (version: 0)

Testing different methods of checking whether an element is or is in another element. Start from the position where you have jquery objects. Make === or parentNodes a function call. Check that alternatives return the correct answer.

Comparing performance of: is() or contains() vs == or contains() vs !!closest.length vs == and parentNodes

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

is() or contains()

== or contains()

!!closest.length

== and parentNodes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):