var str = "22/07/2019 13:36:26";
var regex = /(\d{2})-(\d{2})-(\d{4}).*/;
str.match(regex);
regex.test(str);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
match | |
test |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
match | 2987317.0 Ops/sec |
test | 3576920.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark test and explain what's being tested, compared, and analyzed.
Benchmark Test Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two regular expression (regex) methods: regex.test()
and str.match(regex)
.
Tested Options
There are only two options being compared:
regex.test(str)
str.match(regex)
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Both approaches use regex to extract a specific pattern from a string, but they differ in their syntax and behavior.
regex.test(str)
:str.match(regex)
: (Note: This is a deprecated method. It's recommended to use str.match()
without the parentheses.)Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is used. The regex engine is built into the browser's JavaScript interpreter.
Special JS Features or Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in this benchmark.
Alternatives
If you need to compare performance of different regex methods, here are some alternatives:
regex-test
(npm package).benchmarkjs
.Keep in mind that this specific benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two specific regex methods. Depending on your use case, you might want to explore other approaches for measuring regex performance.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided script preparation code creates a sample string str
and defines a regex pattern regex
. The HTML preparation code is empty (no HTML is involved in this benchmark).
Overall, this benchmark tests the relative performance of two common regex methods in JavaScript. By analyzing the results, developers can gain insights into which approach to use depending on their specific requirements.