const el = document.createElement('div');
el.append(
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div')
)
el.replaceChildren(
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div')
)
const el = document.createElement('div');
el.append(
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div')
)
el.textContent = '';
el.append(
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div'),
document.createElement('div')
)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
replaceChildren | |
textContent + append |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
replaceChildren | 116437.5 Ops/sec |
textContent + append | 120353.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of what's being tested on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to replace or update child elements in a DOM node: replaceChildren
and textContent + append
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
replaceChildren
: This method replaces the existing child nodes of an element with new ones.textContent + append
: This approach sets the text content of an element to an empty string and then appends new child nodes using the append
method.Pros and Cons
replaceChildren
:
Pros:
Cons:
textContent + append
:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used (if applicable)
In this benchmark, there doesn't appear to be any explicit library usage mentioned in the JSON definition. However, it's likely that the benchmark is being run on a modern JavaScript engine or runtime environment that implements these DOM methods.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code appears to be standard vanilla JavaScript.
Other Considerations
When considering these approaches, it's essential to consider the specific use case and requirements of your application. If you frequently replace a large number of child nodes, replaceChildren
might be the better choice. However, if you often update small elements or need to minimize memory usage, textContent + append
could be more suitable.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to replacing or updating child elements in DOM nodes include:
insertBefore
and appendChild
: Instead of replacing all child nodes at once, this approach inserts new child nodes after an existing node using insertBefore
, and then appends additional nodes.NodeLists
: Instead of using the replaceChildren
method, you can create a NodeList
of elements to replace, which can provide better performance for large sets of child nodes.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches might have different pros and cons compared to the methods being tested on MeasureThat.net.