var test = 'More Text for TESTING'
test.toLowerCase()
test.toUpperCase()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash toUpper | |
native toUpperCase |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash toUpper | 166776384.0 Ops/sec |
native toUpperCase | 160118464.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark provided by MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to convert a string from lowercase to uppercase: using the built-in toUpperCase()
method (also known as "native" or "vanilla") and using the popular utility library Lodash's toUpper
function.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
toUpperCase()
method, which is a part of the JavaScript language standard.toUpper
function from the Lodash library, which provides additional functionality for string manipulation.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Native toUpperCase:
Pros:
Cons:
Lodash toUpper:
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors:
toUpper
function may be a better choice.toUpperCase()
method may be faster due to its built-in implementation.Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functional programming helpers. The toUpper
function in particular is useful for converting strings to uppercase while preserving non-ASCII characters.
In this benchmark, Lodash's toUpper
function is compared to the native toUpperCase()
method. The results show that both approaches have similar performance, but the native method may be slightly faster due to its built-in implementation.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of Lodash requires an external dependency and may not be suitable for all projects.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark provided by MeasureThat.net!