var massiveArray = new Array(100000).fill().map(e => Math.random())
Math.max(massiveArray)
massiveArray.reduce((a, b) => a > b ? a : b)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Math.min | |
Array.reduce |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Math.min | 616.1 Ops/sec |
Array.reduce | 335.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript functions: Math.max
and Array.prototype.reduce
. The goal is to determine which function is faster for large arrays.
Options Compared
The benchmark tests two approaches:
a > b
) and returns the larger value.Pros and Cons
Math.max
due to the overhead of creating a new accumulator variable and iterating through the array.Other Considerations
In addition to the two main functions, there is another option mentioned in the benchmark setup code:
Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features mentioned in the provided code snippet. However, the use of Array.prototype.reduce
does introduce some nuances related to array methods:
reduce()
method is a part of the ECMAScript standard.Array
prototype.Alternative Approaches
Other ways to find the maximum value in a large array might include:
lodash
) or frameworks that provide optimized functions for finding maximum values in arrays.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may introduce additional overhead, complexity, or dependencies not accounted for in the benchmark setup code provided.