new Date();
new Date(2002,02,20,02,20);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Date() | |
new Date(YY,MM,DD,hh,mm) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Date() | 3487328.0 Ops/sec |
new Date(YY,MM,DD,hh,mm) | 3776000.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is an object with four properties: Name
, Description
, Script Preparation Code
, and Html Preparation Code
. However, in this case, all these properties are empty or null. The purpose of a benchmark definition is to specify the test scenario and how it's prepared for execution.
Individual Test Cases
The individual test cases are arrays of objects, each representing a single test scenario. There are two test cases:
new Date();
new Date(2002,02,20,02,20);
These test cases are comparing the performance of creating a new Date
object without any arguments versus creating one with specific year, month, day, hour, and minute values.
Library and Features
Neither of these test cases uses any external library. However, it's worth noting that the Date
class is a built-in JavaScript class that provides functionality for working with dates and times.
Options Compared
The two test cases are comparing the performance of creating a new Date
object with:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Date
object without any arguments (new Date();
):Date
object with specific values (new Date(2002,02,20,02,20);
):Other Considerations
When creating a new Date
object, it's essential to consider issues like:
Date
class uses a leap year algorithm that may not be accurate for all dates.Alternatives
If you need to compare performance of different date creation methods, here are some alternative approaches:
Keep in mind that the specific requirements of your project will influence the choice of approach.