Benchmark: Regexp Greedy vs lazy cost v2

Script Preparation code:

str = '§625865/25565❤     §225,000/25k Drill Fuel'
badStr = '§c4994/4994❤     §b-25 Mana (§6Instant Transmission§b)     §b2929/2929✎ §3200ʬ    §70/3 Secrets'
lazyRE = RegExp('^§[6c](\\d+)\\/(\\d+)❤(\\+§c\\d+.)?? +(?:§a(\\d+)§a❈ Defense|([^✎]*?))??(?: +§b(\\d+)\\/(\\d+)✎ +(?:Mana|§3(\\d+)ʬ))??(?: +(§[27].*))??$', 'g')
greedyRE = RegExp('^§[6c](\\d+)\\/(\\d+)❤(\\+§c\\d+.)? +(?:§a(\\d+)§a❈ Defense|([^✎]*?))?(?: +§b(\\d+)\\/(\\d+)✎ +(?:Mana|§3(\\d+)ʬ))?(?: +(§[27].*))?$', 'g')

Tests:

Lazy & good string
lazyRE.test(str)
Lazy & bad string
lazyRE.test(badStr)
Greedy & good string
greedyRE.test(str)
Greedy & bad string
greedyRE.test(badStr)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lazy & good string
Lazy & bad string
Greedy & good string
Greedy & bad string

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.60 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 100 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lazy & good string	1471331.0 Ops/sec
Lazy & bad string	1182084.0 Ops/sec
Greedy & good string	1525217.0 Ops/sec
Greedy & bad string	1248383.0 Ops/sec

Regexp Greedy vs lazy cost v2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lazy & good string vs Lazy & bad string vs Greedy & good string vs Greedy & bad string

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lazy & good string

Lazy & bad string

Greedy & good string

Greedy & bad string

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A