var a = ['hello', 'a', 'bc', 'helloa'];
var b = a.indexOf('helloa');
var a = ['hello', 'a', 'bc', 'helloa'];
var b = a.includes('helloa');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Index Of | |
Includez |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Index Of | 56067708.0 Ops/sec |
Includez | 55527240.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The test case is comparing two approaches to search for a substring within an array in JavaScript: indexOf
and includes
. The goal is to determine which method is faster on average.
Options Compared
indexOf
: A method that returns the index of the first occurrence of a specified value within an array, or -1 if it's not found.includes
: A method that returns true if an element with the specified value exists in an array, and false otherwise. It does not return the index.Pros and Cons
indexOf
:includes
due to its additional checks and potential overhead.includes
:indexOf
.Library Used
Neither indexOf
nor includes
uses any external libraries. They are built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on the performance comparison between two standard methods.
Other Considerations
Alternative Approaches
If you need to perform substring searching on an array, consider the following alternatives:
indexOf
or includes
, they may also introduce additional overhead and complexity.indexOf
or includes
.Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific requirements, data types, and performance considerations.