Benchmark: filter vs reduce control

Script Preparation code:

var relationships = [{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsing"},{source_ref: "blahblahsing"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"}]

Tests:

filter + includes
relationships.filter((relationship) => relationship.source_ref.includes("sighting"))
reduce + includes
relationships.reduce((mem, relationship) => { if (relationship.source_ref.includes("sighting")) { mem.push(relationship) } return mem; }, [])
filter + indexOf
relationships.filter((relationship) => relationship.source_ref.indexOf("sighting") > -1)
reduce + indexOf
relationships.reduce((mem, relationship) => { if (relationship.source_ref.indexOf("sighting") > -1) { mem.push(relationship) } return mem; }, [])

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
filter + includes
reduce + includes
filter + indexOf
reduce + indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/105.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 105 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
filter + includes	4604496.0 Ops/sec
reduce + includes	4613576.0 Ops/sec
filter + indexOf	4996791.0 Ops/sec
reduce + indexOf	4818962.0 Ops/sec

filter vs reduce control (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: filter + includes vs reduce + includes vs filter + indexOf vs reduce + indexOf

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

filter + includes

reduce + includes

filter + indexOf

reduce + indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A