Benchmark: Compare method - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script
  src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js"
  integrity="sha256-CSXorXvZcTkaix6Yvo6HppcZGetbYMGWSFlBw8HfCJo="
  crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

<div id="outer">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div id="inner">

</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


<div id="outer2">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div id="inner2">

</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

var inner = document.getElementById("inner");
var outer = document.getElementById("outer");

Tests:

contains() method
var x = outer.contains(inner)
parrentElement() method
inner.parentElement === outer

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
contains() method
parrentElement() method

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created using MeasureThat.net, a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The test is designed to compare two methods: `contains()` and `parentElement()`. We'll break down what each method does, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Library:** jQuery

The benchmark script includes the jQuery library, which is a popular JavaScript library used for DOM manipulation, event handling, and more. In this test, jQuery is used to manipulate the HTML structure of the document.

**Test Cases:**

1. `contains()` method:
	* This method checks if an element (in this case, `inner`) contains another element (`outer`).
	* The `contains()` method traverses the DOM tree upwards from the containing element until it finds the specified element or reaches the root.
	* Pros: Efficient in terms of memory usage and execution time since it only accesses the necessary elements.
	* Cons: May be slower for very deep DOM trees, as it needs to traverse further up the tree.
2. `parentElement()` method:
	* This method returns the parent element of a given element (`inner`).
	* It traverses the DOM tree upwards from the specified element until it finds the next non-container element (i.e., an element with a `nodeName` that doesn't end with a double colon `:`, indicating a container element like `div`, `span`, etc.).
	* Pros: Faster for very deep DOM trees, as it can stop traversing as soon as it finds a non-container element.
	* Cons: May be slower when accessing elements at the top of the DOM tree.

**Special JS feature:** None mentioned in this test case.

Other considerations:

* The benchmark uses a simple HTML structure with multiple `div` elements nested inside each other. This creates a deep DOM tree, which can affect performance.
* Both methods are compared on the same set of data (a single `inner` element within an `outer` container), so we should expect similar results for both.

**Alternative approaches:**

For similar use cases, you might consider using other DOM manipulation APIs or techniques, such as:

1. `closest()` method: Similar to `parentElement()`, but traverses the DOM tree only until it finds a matching element, stopping at the first match.
2. `querySelector`/`querySelectorAll`: These methods can be used to select elements by their CSS selectors, which can be more efficient than using `contains()` or `parentElement()`.
3. Using libraries like React or Angular for component-based DOM manipulation, which often provide optimized and optimized DOM updates.

Keep in mind that the choice of method depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/99.0.4844.51 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 99 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
contains() method	2324264.5 Ops/sec
parrentElement() method	3153161.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Compare method (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: contains() method vs parrentElement() method

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

contains() method

parrentElement() method

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):