var myArray = [27, 11, 46, 64, 62, 42, 5, 9];
Math.max(myArray);
var myArray = [27, 11, 46, 64, 62, 42, 5, 9];
myArray.reduce((a, b) => Math.max(a, b))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Spread operator | |
Array.prototype.reduce() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Spread operator | 1565608.1 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.reduce() | 538709.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to find the maximum value in an array: using the spread operator (...
) and Array.prototype.reduce()
. The script preparation code and HTML preparation code are both empty, which suggests that the focus is on comparing the JavaScript implementation rather than other factors like DOM manipulation or rendering.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
...
) to extract a subset of an array's elements, in this case, to find the maximum value.reduce()
method provided by the Array prototype to accumulate and compute the maximum value.Pros and Cons
Here are some general pros and cons of each approach:
In general, for small arrays or cases where the maximum value is not needed beyond that, the spread operator might be a better choice. However, when dealing with larger datasets or multiple aggregations, Array.prototype.reduce()
can provide more flexibility and efficiency.
Library Usage
There are no libraries being used in this benchmark.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark uses the following features:
...
) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows extracting a subset of an array's elements.Other Alternatives
If you needed to compare other approaches, here are some alternatives:
reduce()
by applying Math.max()
to an array mapped from another value.Note that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, syntax, and use cases compared to the spread operator and Array.prototype.reduce()
.