Benchmark: equality vs comparison

Script Preparation code:

var j=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
var t=5
var d=20

Tests:

comparison
j[0]<=d<=j[1] j[0]<=t<=j[1]
equality
j[0]==d && j[1]==d && j[2]==d && j[3]==d && j[4]==d && j[5]==d && j[6]==d j[0]==t && j[1]==t && j[2]==t && j[3]==t &&j [4]==t && j[5]==t && j[6]==t
in
d in j t in j
indexof
j.indexOf(d) j.indexOf(t)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
comparison
equality
in
indexof

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Overview**

The test measures the performance of JavaScript equality checks, comparisons, and use of the "in" operator on an array with fixed values. The benchmark compares four different approaches:

1. Equality check using `===` (e.g., `j[0] === d && ...`)
2. Comparison check using `<=` and `>=` operators (e.g., `j[0] <= d <= j[1]`)
3. Use of the "in" operator (e.g., `d in j`)
4. Use of `indexOf()` method to find the index of an element in the array (e.g., `j.indexOf(d)`)

**Comparison Approach**

Here's a brief explanation of each approach:

* **Equality check (`===`)**: This is the most straightforward way to compare two values. However, it may not be as efficient as other approaches, especially for large arrays.
* **Comparison check using `<`, `>`, `<=`, and `>=`**: This approach can be faster than equality checks because it avoids creating intermediate objects or performing additional operations. However, it may not work correctly if the array values are complex objects with many properties.
* **Use of "in" operator**: The "in" operator returns a boolean value indicating whether an element is present in the array. This approach can be slower than the comparison check because JavaScript has to search for the element in the array.
* **Use of `indexOf()` method**: This approach searches for the first occurrence of the specified value in the array and returns its index. If the value is not found, it returns -1.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

* **Equality check (`===`)**:
	+ Pros: Simple, widely supported, and works well for primitive values.
	+ Cons: May be slower than comparison checks or "in" operator for large arrays.
* **Comparison check using `<`, `>`, `<=`, and `>=`**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster than equality checks, especially when the array contains many properties.
	+ Cons: May not work correctly with complex objects or arrays.
* **Use of "in" operator**: 
	+ Pros: Easy to use and works well for simple arrays.
	+ Cons: May be slower than comparison checks due to search overhead.
* **Use of `indexOf()` method**:
	+ Pros: Returns the index of the first occurrence, which can be useful in some cases.
	+ Cons: Slower than other approaches, especially when searching for a specific element in large arrays.

**Library and Special JS Features**

There are no libraries used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of `indexOf()` method relies on JavaScript's built-in array methods.

No special JavaScript features or syntaxes are used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

Alternative approaches to measure performance include:

* **Using a different data structure**, such as an object or a Set, instead of an array.
* **Measuring the time complexity** of each approach using Big O notation (e.g., O(n), O(log n), etc.).
* **Comparing the performance of different JavaScript engines**, such as V8, SpiderMonkey, or Safari's JavaScript engine.

These alternatives can provide more insights into the performance characteristics of each approach and help developers optimize their code for better performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 69 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
comparison	65534200.0 Ops/sec
equality	91410480.0 Ops/sec
in	102999608.0 Ops/sec
indexof	41920604.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

equality vs comparison (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: comparison vs equality vs in vs indexof

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

comparison

equality

in

indexof

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):