<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var obj = {};
var a = _.isEmpty(obj)
for (var x in obj) { return false; }
return true;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | |
forEach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | 4184184.0 Ops/sec |
forEach | 14532164.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is testing two different approaches to check if an object is empty: using the _.isEmpty
function from the Lodash library, and using a traditional for...in
loop with early returns.
Options compared:
for...in
. If any property exists, the loop continues; otherwise, it breaks out and returns false.Pros and Cons:
Library usage:
The lodash
library is used in the benchmark to provide the _.isEmpty
function. The library is included via a CDN link (https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js
) to make it easily accessible during testing.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. It's straightforward JavaScript code that leverages the Lodash library and traditional for...in
loop approaches.
Other alternatives:
In addition to Lodash's _.isEmpty, other alternatives for checking if an object is empty include:
Object.keys()
to get an array of object properties and then check its length using the length
property.for...of
loop to iterate over the object's own enumerable properties and use hasOwnProperty()
to skip inherited properties.Object.entries()
to get an array of key-value pairs and then use the filter()
method to check if any pair exists.These alternatives can be used in place of Lodash's _.isEmpty or traditional for...in loop approaches, but they may require more code and might have slightly different performance characteristics.