const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const finalObject = {
firstObject
};
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 54205956.0 Ops/sec |
Using Object.assign | 3049310.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches for creating a shallow copy of an object:
...
)Object.assign()
with an empty object as the target.What are we comparing?
We're comparing the execution time and speed of these two approaches on a desktop Windows machine running Chrome 98.
Options Compared:
const finalObject = { ...firstObject }
)Object.assign()
: Creating a shallow copy using this method.Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
...
):Object.assign():
Library Usage:
None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that Object.assign()
is a built-in method in JavaScript, while the spread operator (...
) is supported since ECMAScript 2018.
Special JS Features or Syntax:
The benchmark uses ES6 syntax for the spread operator (...
), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015. This feature allows for more concise and readable object creation.
Other Considerations:
When deciding between these two approaches, consider the following:
Object.assign()
is likely a safer option.Other Alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches to creating copies of objects in JavaScript:
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
: This method creates a deep copy of an object, but it's not recommended due to potential security issues and performance overhead.Array.prototype.slice()
or Array.prototype.concat()
: These methods create shallow copies of arrays.Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case and requirements. Always consider readability, maintainability, and performance when choosing a solution.