new Date();
new Date(Date.now());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Today | |
With timestamp |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Today | 1459653.9 Ops/sec |
With timestamp | 948658.1 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance of creating a new Date object in JavaScript, specifically comparing two approaches: new Date()
and new Date(Date.now())
.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
new Date()
: This method creates a new Date object without specifying any timestamp.new Date(Date.now())
: This method creates a new Date object with the current timestamp.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
new Date()
: This approach is simpler and more concise, but it may lead to slower performance since the browser has to calculate the current timestamp internally.new Date(Date.now())
: This approach provides better performance since it uses the existing timestamp value from the Date.now()
method, which is typically faster and more accurate.Library Used
None of the benchmark scripts use any external libraries. The Date
object is a built-in JavaScript primitive that does not require any additional dependencies.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark script uses the now()
method on the Date
object to access the current timestamp, which is a standard feature in JavaScript. This allows for efficient and accurate timestamp calculations without relying on external libraries.
Other Alternatives
If you were to write this benchmark from scratch, other alternatives could include:
requestAnimationFrame()
or setInterval()
) to measure execution times.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional complexity, dependencies, or trade-offs in terms of performance and accuracy.
Overall, the provided benchmark script provides a clear and concise comparison of two JavaScript Date object creation approaches, making it easy to understand and analyze the results.