var foo = { value: "asdf" };
foo.value === 'default';
eval(`foo.value === 'default'`);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
condition | |
eval |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
condition | 11929287.0 Ops/sec |
eval | 2377619.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested and the options being compared.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is called "eval vs direction condition 2" and it's used to compare two different approaches: using a directional comparison operator (===
) versus using eval()
to evaluate an expression containing that operator.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code sets up a variable foo
with the value "asdf"
.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code, which suggests that this benchmark only tests JavaScript code and doesn't involve any GUI or UI-related components.
Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
foo.value
variable with the string "default"
using a directional comparison operator (===
). The intention is to see which approach is faster.eval()
to evaluate an expression containing the same comparison: eval(
foo.value === 'default')
.Options being compared
The two options being compared are:
===
)eval()
to evaluate an expression containing that operatorPros and Cons of each approach
===
):eval()
:Library/Functionality being used
In this benchmark, no specific library is explicitly mentioned. However, the use of eval()
suggests that some form of dynamic evaluation might be involved.
Special JS feature or syntax
There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The tests seem to focus on comparing two basic approaches: using a directional comparison operator versus using eval()
.