Benchmark: Date.parse vs custom

Script Preparation code:

var dateString = '2000-01-25';

function parseDate(str) {
  const dateValues = str.split('-');

  return new Date(dateValues[0], dateValues[1] - 1, dateValues[2]);
}

Tests:

Date.parse
var parsedDate = new Date(Date.parse(dateString));
custom
var parsedDate = parseDate(dateString);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Date.parse
custom

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/61.0.3163.31 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 61 on Mac OS X 10.12.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Date.parse	1459488.0 Ops/sec
custom	1650290.0 Ops/sec

Date.parse vs custom (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Date.parse vs custom

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Date.parse

custom

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A