var cache = {};
function createElement(elementName) {
return (cache[elementName] &&
cache[elementName].cloneNode(true)) ||
(cache[elementName] = document.createElement(elementName));
}
function createElement2(elementName) {
return document.createElement(elementName);
}
createElement('div');
createElement2('div')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Cache | |
Un-cached |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Cache | 2061992.1 Ops/sec |
Un-cached | 2054412.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition consists of two JavaScript functions: createElement
and createElement2
. Both functions are used to create HTML elements, but they have different behavior:
createElement(elementName)
creates an HTML element with the specified name. If the element does not exist in memory, it is created by cloning a cached version (if available) or creating a new one.createElement2(elementName)
simply creates a new HTML element without caching.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
createElement
, uses caching to improve performance. It checks if an element already exists in the cache and clones it instead of creating a new one. This approach can reduce memory allocation and garbage collection overhead.createElement2
, does not use caching. It creates a new HTML element every time it is called.Pros and Cons
Library Usage
Neither of the benchmarked functions uses any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines, like SpiderMonkey (used in Firefox), provide built-in mechanisms for caching and optimizing DOM creation.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two approaches to create HTML elements with different caching behaviors.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to add more options to the benchmark, you could consider adding:
Keep in mind that each alternative would require additional modifications to the benchmark definition and test cases.