let array = new Array(100000).fill(0);
while (array.length > 0) {
array.pop();
}
let array = new Array(100000).fill(0);
array.length = 0;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array pop | |
Array set length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array pop | 1292.6 Ops/sec |
Array set length | 2078.7 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.
Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for manipulating arrays in JavaScript:
array.pop()
: Removing elements from the end of an array using pop()
.length
property of an array directly.Options compared
The two options are being compared:
array.pop()
to remove elements from the end of the array.length
property of the array directly to a new value, without modifying individual elements.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
array.pop()
because it avoids the overhead of iterating through the array.Cons:
length
property, which can be error-prone if not done correctly.Library usage
There is no library mentioned in this benchmark. The code uses native JavaScript features to manipulate arrays.
Special JS feature or syntax
No special JS features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other approaches, here are a few alternatives:
array.splice()
: Removing elements from the array using splice()
, which returns an array of removed elements.Array.from()
and fill()
: Creating a new array with a specified length and filling it with a value.map()
or reduce()
: Using these methods to create a new array with modified values.Keep in mind that each alternative has its own trade-offs, and the best approach depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
If you have any questions or would like more information on these alternatives, feel free to ask!