"010-1234-5678".replace(/-/g, "");
"010-1234-5678".replaceAll("-", "");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
replace regex global | |
replaceAll |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
replace regex global | 12317432.0 Ops/sec |
replaceAll | 8952836.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, along with the pros and cons of different approaches.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two string replacement methods: replace()
(with global flag) and replaceAll()
. Both methods are used to replace hyphens (-
) in a given input string with an empty string.
Options Compared
replace()
with global flag: This method uses the g
flag at the end of the regular expression to perform a global replacement, meaning all occurrences of the pattern are replaced.replaceAll()
: This method is not part of standard JavaScript, but rather a custom implementation often used in C-style languages like C or C++. It seems to be implemented as a wrapper around the replace()
method.Pros and Cons
replace()
with global flag:replaceAll()
:replace()
due to caching or optimized implementation.Library and Custom Implementation
In this case, the replaceAll()
method is implemented as a wrapper around the standard JavaScript replace()
method. This suggests that the custom implementation is trying to mimic the behavior of C-style replaceAll()
functions.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's purely focused on comparing two string replacement methods.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to test alternative approaches, some options could include:
regex.replace()
with the g
flag (a more modern and widely supported approach).Array.prototype.map()
or String.prototype.split()
.Keep in mind that each alternative would require a separate benchmark setup and results interpretation.
I hope this explanation helps!