Benchmark: Comparison different type of checking string values

Script Preparation code:

var Status = {};
Status['PENDING'] = 'pending';
Status['IN_PROGRESS'] = 'in_progress';
Status['FAILED'] = 'failed';
Status['DONE'] = 'done';

var st = 'done';

var regexp = new RegExp(`${Status.A}|${Status.B}`, 'i');
var set1 = new Set([Status.A,Status.B]);
var set = new Set([Status.A,Status.B]);

Tests:

Using logical operators
if ( st === Status['PENDING'] || st === Status['IN_PROGRESS']) { return true }
Using RexExp
if ( regexp.test(st) ) { return true }
Using set of values
if ( set.has(st) ) { return true }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using logical operators
Using RexExp
Using set of values

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.110 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 96 on Mac OS X 10.15.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Using logical operators	4233498.0 Ops/sec
Using RexExp	7562214.0 Ops/sec
Using set of values	8322749.0 Ops/sec

Comparison different type of checking string values (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using logical operators vs Using RexExp vs Using set of values

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using logical operators

Using RexExp

Using set of values

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A