var arr = ['1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8']
arr.join("-")
arr.toString()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
join("-") | |
toString |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
join("-") | 6823028.0 Ops/sec |
toString | 5727566.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the test case and explain what's being tested, compared, and analyzed.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark compares two approaches to join an array of strings into a single string: array.join("-")
and array.toString()
. The test aims to determine which approach is faster and more efficient.
Options compared:
Two options are being compared:
"-"
). In this case, it's used to join the individual strings in the arr
array.join()
, it can be used as a workaround by converting each element to a string and concatenating them.Pros and Cons:
toString()
approach.join()
, allowing for more complex concatenation scenarios.Other considerations:
arr
array is populated with a large number of elements, which may impact the performance difference between these two approaches.join()
and toString()
methods might not be the most efficient way to concatenate strings in all JavaScript scenarios. Other methods like using map()
, reduce()
, or even simple string concatenation (+
) might be more suitable.Library usage:
In this benchmark, no specific library is used. However, if libraries like Lodash or other utility functions were used to implement these approaches (e.g., _.join()
), it would affect the comparison.
Special JS feature or syntax:
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two standard methods for concatenating arrays of strings.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives for joining arrays of strings include:
_.join()
) or underscore-strings (_str.join()
)....
) and string concatenation (+
): arr.join(" ") + arr.map(x => x)
.reduce()
) to concatenate the strings: arr.reduce((acc, x) => acc + x, '')
.