var array1 = Array(100).fill(1);
var array2;
array2 = array1.slice(1);
array1.shift();
array2 = array1;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
shift |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 1442448.4 Ops/sec |
shift | 1540921.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its individual test cases.
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark, titled "array shift - array slice," tests two different approaches for shifting elements in an array: using shift()
and using slice()
. The goal of this benchmark is to determine which approach is faster.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code is:
var array1 = Array(100).fill(1);
var array2;
This code creates a new array array1
with 100 elements, all initialized to the value 1
. The variable array2
is declared but not initialized.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided for this benchmark. This means that the benchmark only tests the JavaScript execution time and does not take into account any rendering or layout-related overhead.
Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two test cases:
array2 = array1.slice(1);
This test case uses the slice()
method to create a new array array2
that includes all elements from array1
, starting from the second element (index 1).
Pros of using slice()
: It is generally considered a more modern and efficient way to create a subset of an array. slice()
returns a shallow copy of the original array, which can be useful if you need to modify the resulting array.
Cons of using slice()
: Creating a new array can be memory-intensive for large datasets. Additionally, slice()
can be slower than other methods for small arrays because it involves creating a new array object.
array1.shift();
array2 = array1;
This test case uses the shift()
method to remove the first element from array1
and assigns the resulting array to array2
.
Pros of using shift()
: It is often faster than slice()
because it modifies the original array in place, reducing memory allocations. However, shift()
can be slower for large arrays due to its iterative nature.
Cons of using shift()
: It can be less efficient than slice()
because it involves modifying the original array, which may lead to additional overhead.
Library and Special JS Features
Neither test case uses any libraries or special JavaScript features beyond the standard language syntax. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two basic array manipulation techniques.
Other Alternatives
Alternative methods for shifting elements in an array include:
unshift()
: Adds one or more elements to the beginning of an array.[a, b] = array;
).forEach()
with a callback function: Iterating over an array and performing operations on each element.These alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the shift()
and slice()
methods used in the benchmark.