Benchmark: querySelector on data attribute vs getElementsByClassName 1

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="parent">parent<div><div class="child" data-type="child" >child</div></div></div>

Tests:

querySelector
document.getElementById("parent").querySelector('[data-type="child"]')
getElementsByClassName
document.getElementById("parent").getElementsByClassName("child")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
querySelector
getElementsByClassName

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.93 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 96 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
querySelector	2739715.0 Ops/sec
getElementsByClassName	3587490.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test on MeasureThat.net, where users can create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. In this specific case, we have two test cases: `querySelector` and `getElementsByClassName`.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark tests the performance difference between using the `querySelector` method versus the `getElementsByClassName` method to select an HTML element based on a data attribute.

**Options compared:**

There are two options being compared:

1. **querySelector**: This method selects elements using CSS selectors.
2. **getElementsByClassName**: This method retrieves all elements that have the specified class name, which can be used as an attribute selector.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **querySelector**:
	+ Pros:
		- More flexible and powerful for complex CSS selectors.
		- Can select multiple elements at once using `querySelectorAll`.
	+ Cons:
		- Can be slower due to the parsing and execution time of CSS selectors.
		- Requires more memory as it needs to store the parsed selector tree.
* **getElementsByClassName**:
	+ Pros:
		- Faster execution time, as it uses a simpler attribute selector.
		- Less memory usage, as it only retrieves elements with the specified class name.
	+ Cons:
		- Limited flexibility and power compared to `querySelector`.
		- Can return multiple elements if the class name is present in multiple elements.

**Library and purpose:**

The `querySelector` method uses the W3C CSSom (CSS Object Model) API, which provides an interface between HTML documents and CSS selectors. This library allows JavaScript to manipulate and query the Document Object Model (DOM).

In this benchmark, both methods are used with a single attribute (`data-type`) on the child element.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There is no specific special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two different DOM selection methods.

**Other alternatives:**

If you want to explore alternative methods for selecting elements, here are a few options:

* **ElementById**: Selects an element by its ID.
* **getElementsByTagName**: Retrieves all elements with a specified tag name.
* **querySelectorAll**: Selects multiple elements using CSS selectors (similar to `querySelector`, but returns an array of elements).

Keep in mind that each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use depends on your specific use case and requirements.

I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in this benchmark!

Related benchmarks:

querySelector on data attribute vs getElementsByClassName 1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: querySelector vs getElementsByClassName

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

querySelector

getElementsByClassName

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):