const arr1 = new Array(500).fill(null).map(() => Math.random());
const arr2 = new Array(300).fill(null).map(() => Math.random());
const arr3 = arr1.concat(arr2);
const arr1 = new Array(500).fill(null).map(() => Math.random());
const arr2 = new Array(300).fill(null).map(() => Math.random());
const arr3 = [arr1, arr2]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
concat | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
concat | 6599.3 Ops/sec |
spread | 5405.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and some of the considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for measuring JavaScript performance. It defines two test cases:
Array.prototype.concat()
method....
) used to concatenate two arrays.Options Compared
In this benchmark, we have two options compared:
Array.prototype.concat()
: The traditional way of concatenating arrays in JavaScript....
): A newer syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows for more concise and expressive array concatenation.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Array.prototype.concat()
: Pros:...
): Pros:concat()
.Library Used
In both test cases, no external libraries are used. The Array.prototype.concat()
method and the spread operator (...
) are built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The use of the spread operator (...
) is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for more concise array concatenation, but it's not supported in older browsers. This means that if you want to ensure compatibility across different browsers, using concat()
might be a safer choice.
Other Alternatives
If you need to compare other array concatenation methods or syntaxes, you can consider adding additional test cases. Some alternatives could include:
Array.prototype.push()
and push()
: This method modifies the original array by appending new elements.concat()
with a callback function: This approach can be useful when working with asynchronous data or when performance is critical.For example, you could add another test case to compare push()
:
{
"Benchmark Definition": "const arr1 = new Array(500).fill(null);\r\nconst arr2 = new Array(300).fill(null);\r\narr1.push(...arr2);",
"Test Name": "push"
}
This test case would measure the performance of using push()
to concatenate two arrays.