'100.1234'.match(/(\d+)\.?(\d+)?/)
'56900.1499999234'.match(/(\d+)\.?(\d+)?/)
'9912883.4440040400400234'.match(/(\d+)\.?(\d+)?/)
'100.1234'.split('.')
'56900.1499999234'.split('.')
'9912883.4440040400400234'.split('.')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Regex Match | |
Split |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Regex Match | 1834452.9 Ops/sec |
Split | 1729553.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the Benchmark Definition and test cases provided.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark, titled "Regex vs Split", tests the performance of two different approaches to achieve the same goal:
.
) character as the separator.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches on three test cases, each with a different input string:
100.1234
56900.1499999234
9912883.4440040400400234
Each test case consists of two identical operations: executing the regex pattern and splitting the string using dot (.
) as the separator.
Pros and Cons
Regex Approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Split Approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
The benchmark does not consider other factors that might affect performance, such as:
Library Used (None)
There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. The regex pattern is a standard JavaScript syntax.
Special JS Feature/Syntax (None)
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code fields are empty, indicating that the benchmark does not require any specific setup or configuration beyond what's provided by the browser.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for string processing could include:
js-string-utils
)Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to the specific use case and performance testing goals outlined in this benchmark.