var obj;
undefined !== obj;
'undefined' !== typeof obj;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
undefined | |
typeof |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
undefined | 891027264.0 Ops/sec |
typeof | 880067904.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and analyze what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of object lookup using different methods:
undefined
typeof
in
hasOwnProperty
These four methods are used to check if a variable (obj
) is defined or exists in an object.
Pros and Cons of each approach
undefined
: This method simply checks if the variable is assigned a value (i.e., not undefined). The pros are:obj
has no properties.
However, the cons are:typeof
: This method returns the data type of the variable ("object"
in this case). The pros are:obj
has properties but not all of them have values.
However, the cons are:in
: This method uses the in
operator to check if a property exists in an object. The pros are:hasOwnProperty
: This method checks if a property belongs to the object itself (i.e., not its prototype chain). The pros are:in
for objects with complex inheritance.Library: obj
The variable obj
is assumed to be an object that has properties. The library used is likely built-in JavaScript Object.
Special JS features or syntax
There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
Some other methods for checking if a variable exists or has a property include:
instanceof
: checks if an object is an instance of a constructor function.Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call()
: similar to hasOwnProperty
, but uses the call()
method to check if a property belongs to the object itself.Set
data structure and adding elements (which would work for this specific benchmark)