var {toString} = Object.prototype;
var date = new Date();
var c =0;
if(toString.call(date) === '[object Date]') {c++}
if(date instanceof Date) {c++}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
instanceof |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 2480664.8 Ops/sec |
instanceof | 2062708.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is comparing two ways to check if an object is of type Date
in JavaScript:
toString()
: Using the toString()
method on the object to check its type.instanceof
: Using the instanceof
operator to check if the object is an instance of the Date
constructor.Options being compared
The two options being compared are:
toString()
: This method returns a string representation of the object, which can be used to check its type.instanceof
: This operator checks if the object is an instance of the specified constructor or class. In this case, it's checking if the object is an instance of Date
.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
toString()
:instanceof
:toString()
Library used
In this benchmark, the Date
constructor is being used. The Date
constructor is a built-in JavaScript function that creates new date objects. It's not a library in the classical sense, but rather a fundamental part of the JavaScript language.
Special JS feature or syntax
The instanceof
operator is a special syntax in JavaScript that allows you to check if an object is an instance of a particular constructor or class. This is a built-in language feature and does not require any additional setup or configuration.
Other alternatives
If you were to rewrite this benchmark using alternative approaches, here are some possibilities:
Date
constructor or a different date librarytypeof
or constructor.name
However, these alternatives would likely change the nature of the benchmark and its focus, so it's not clear how they would be relevant to this specific test case.