let x = "not undefined";
typeof x === "undefined"
let x;
typeof x === "undefined"
let x = "not undefined";
x === undefined
let x;
x === undefined
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
typeof string is undefined | |
typeof undefined is undefined | |
string is undefined | |
undefined is undefined |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
typeof string is undefined | 1035502784.0 Ops/sec |
typeof undefined is undefined | 1029543552.0 Ops/sec |
string is undefined | 18126920.0 Ops/sec |
undefined is undefined | 18099982.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark definition and options being compared, along with their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures which approach is faster for checking if a variable is undefined
. The two approaches are:
typeof variable === "undefined"
(Type of operator)variable === undefined
(Direct comparison)Options Compared
There are four test cases that compare these two approaches, each with a different variable type:
let x = "not undefined";
typeof x === "undefined"
x === undefined
let x;
typeof x === "undefined"
x === undefined
Pros and Cons
typeof variable === "undefined"
)Pros:
Cons:
typeof
operator (e.g., some mobile devices).variable === undefined
)Pros:
Cons:
undefined
, which can lead to unexpected behavior if not handled correctly.Other Considerations
typeof
implementation.Alternative Approaches
"undefined"
, you could use typeof variable === 'undefined'
(note the single quotes) or compare to NaN
for numbers (variable !== NaN
). These approaches might be faster, but they also depend on the specific language and browser implementation.In conclusion, while the Type of Operator approach is more explicit and readable, the Direct Comparison approach is faster due to its simplicity. However, it's essential to weigh these trade-offs based on your specific use case and requirements.