let r = ['asdfsadfsf', 'asdfsdf', 'asdfsadfsadfsf', 'asdfsdafsdf', 'asdfasfasdfasdfsdf']
r.push('ad')
let r = ['asdfsadfsf', 'asdfsdf', 'asdfsadfsadfsf', 'asdfsdafsdf', 'asdfasfasdfasdfsdf']
r = [r, 'ad']
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
push | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
push | 42240172.0 Ops/sec |
spread | 24266760.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using push()
and using the spread operator (...
) with array literals, in JavaScript version 3.
Options Compared
There are two main options being compared:
push()
: This method adds a new element to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array....
): This operator creates a new array by spreading elements from an existing array or values.Pros and Cons
push()
:...
):Library Used
In this benchmark, no specific library is used. The JavaScript engine itself handles the execution of the test cases.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
The benchmark uses a simple array creation and modification pattern to simulate real-world usage scenarios.
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches that might be worth considering include:
unshift()
: This method adds an element to the beginning of an array, which can be slower than push()
.Keep in mind that this benchmark is focused specifically on comparing the performance of push()
and the spread operator (...
) with array literals, so these alternative approaches may not be relevant to this particular use case.