<html>
<body>
<div id='test'>
<div name='a'></div>
<div name='b'></div>
<div name='c'></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
var parent = document.getElementById('test');
let n = parent.childNodes[0];
let n = parent.children[0];
let n = parent.firstChild;
let n = parent.firstElementChild;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
childNodes[0] | |
children[0] | |
firstChild | |
firstElementChild |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
childNodes[0] | 10484387.0 Ops/sec |
children[0] | 10450944.0 Ops/sec |
firstChild | 17028428.0 Ops/sec |
firstElementChild | 16418841.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that measures the performance of four different ways to list children in an HTML element: childNodes
, children
, firstChild
, and firstElementChild
. The benchmark is designed to test which approach is the fastest.
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the following options:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
childNodes
for element children only, as it doesn't need to iterate over non-element nodes.firstChild
, but returns an element node instead of a node object.Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark. However, the HTMLCollection
interface used by all four options is part of the W3C DOM specification and is widely supported across modern browsers.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None of the options use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard DOM API methods.
Alternative Approaches
For larger datasets or performance-critical applications, alternative approaches may include:
forEach
method that can be used to iterate over arrays (including HTMLCollections), which could potentially improve performance.However, these alternatives may not be applicable in this specific benchmark, as it is focused on comparing the basic methods provided by the DOM API.