window.obj = {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3,
d: 4,
e: 5,
}
Object.entries(obj).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => acc[k] = v, {});
const newObj = {}; Object.keys(obj).forEach((k) => newObj[k] = obj[k]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.entries + reduce | |
Object.keys + forEach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.entries + reduce | 647787.6 Ops/sec |
Object.keys + forEach | 10530023.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark.
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case that compares two approaches to iterate over object keys and values: Object.entries
with reduce
, and Object.keys
with forEach
.
Approaches being compared:
Object.entries()
method to get an array of key-value pairs, and then applies the reduce()
method to iterate over the array. The reduce()
method takes a callback function that receives the accumulator (acc
) and the current element ([k, v]
) as arguments.Object.keys()
method to get an array of keys, and then applies the forEach()
method to iterate over the array.Pros and cons of each approach:
reduce()
method and its callback function.Library/Functionality used:
None. These two approaches only use built-in JavaScript methods (Object.entries()
, Object.keys()
, and the reduce()
method).
Special JS feature/syntax: None mentioned in the provided JSON.
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these two approaches on different browsers and devices, allowing users to determine which one performs better for their specific use case.
Other alternatives:
There are other ways to iterate over object keys and values in JavaScript, such as:
for...in
loop:for (var key in obj) {
var value = obj[key];
// ...
}
while
loop with an index variable:var i = 0;
while (i < Object.keys(obj).length) {
var key = Object.keys(obj)[i];
var value = obj[key];
// ...
i++;
}
However, these approaches are generally considered less efficient and more verbose than the two methods being compared in this benchmark.