const EnumObject = {
None: "None",
Test1: "Test1",
Test2: "Test2",
Test3: "Test3",
Test4: "Test4",
Test5: "Test5",
Test6: "Test6",
Test7: "Test7",
Test8: "Test8",
Test9: "Test9",
Test10: "Test10",
Test11: "Test11",
Test12: "Test12",
Test13: "Test13",
Test14: "Test14",
Test15: "Test15",
Test16: "Test16",
Test17: "Test17",
Test18: "Test18",
Test19: "Test19",
Test20: "Test20",
Test21: "Test21",
Test22: "Test22",
Test23: "Test23",
Test24: "Test24",
Test25: "Test25",
Test26: "Test26",
Test27: "Test27",
Test28: "Test28",
Test29: "Test29"
};
const enumVariable = EnumObject.Test;
console.log(enumVariable);
const literalVariable = "Test";
console.log(literalVariable);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Enum Object | |
String Literal |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Enum Object | 218181.8 Ops/sec |
String Literal | 259913.2 Ops/sec |
The provided JSON represents two test cases for the MeasureThat.net JavaScript benchmarking platform: "Large Object Enum vs String Literal".
Benchmark Overview
This benchmark compares the performance of using an enum object versus a string literal in JavaScript.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
"
) and cannot be easily changed.Pros and Cons
Enum Object:
Pros:
Cons:
String Literal:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
None is explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, both options rely on JavaScript's built-in features.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The benchmark does not mention any special JS features or syntax.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The script preparation code for the benchmark is empty, which means that the test cases are likely written in a minimal way to focus solely on the performance difference between enum objects and string literals.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare other approaches, here are some alternative options:
const
declarations instead of variablesKeep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and may not be directly comparable to the original benchmark.