<script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lodash/lodash/4.17.15-npm/core.js"></script>
var mapping = {
'apple': 5,
'orange': 10
};
var fruits = ['apple', 'orange'];
const keys = Object.keys(mapping);
const rows = fruits.map((row) => {
const transformed = {};
for (const key of keys) {
transformed[key] = mapping[key];
}
return transformed;
});
console.log(rows);
var mapping = {
'apple': 5,
'orange': 10
};
var fruits = ['apple', 'orange'];
var keys = Object.keys(mapping);
var rows = fruits.map((row) => {
const transformed = {};
for (var key of keys) {
transformed[key] = mapping[key];
}
return transformed;
});
var rows = fruits.map((row) =>
Object.entries(mapping).reduce((acc, [key, transform]) => {
acc[key] = transform;
return acc;
}, {}),
);
console.log(rows);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
WIth loop321321 | |
With reduce23132 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
WIth loop321321 | 67084.8 Ops/sec |
With reduce23132 | 66127.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Overview
The test compares two approaches to transform an object mapping with JavaScript arrays: using a for...of
loop and using the reduce()
method.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
for...of
loop to iterate over the keys of the mapping
object and assigns the corresponding values to a new object.reduce()
method to transform the mapping
object into a new object, where each key-value pair is created by iterating over the key-value pairs of the original object.Pros and Cons
Loop-Based Approach:
Pros:
Cons:
reduce()
approach, especially for large datasetsReduce-Based Approach:
Pros:
Cons:
reduce()
method and its usage patternsLibrary Used: Lodash
The benchmark uses the Lodash library, specifically the Object.keys()
and reduce()
functions. The Object.keys()
function returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property names, while the reduce()
function applies a transformation to each element in an array.
Special JS Feature or Syntax: None
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches, here are a few options:
forEach()
: You can use the forEach()
method to iterate over an array of keys and assign values to a new object.map()
with a callback function: You can use the map()
method with a callback function to transform each key-value pair in the mapping
object into a new object.In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches to transforming an object mapping: using a loop-based approach and using the reduce()
method. The reduce-based approach is more efficient but may require more knowledge of JavaScript and its methods.