document.body.append(document.createElement('div'),document.createElement('div'),document.createElement('div'));
document.body.append(document.createElement('div'));
document.body.append(document.createElement('div'));
document.body.append(document.createElement('div'));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Append(...Node) | |
Append(Node) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Append(...Node) | 171125.7 Ops/sec |
Append(Node) | 85675.9 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches for appending elements to an HTML document:
append(...Node)
(also known as "spread operator" or "rest parameter syntax")append(Node)
Options Compared
The benchmark tests the performance of these two options, with the first option being the more concise and modern way of appending multiple nodes.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
append(...Node)
:append(Node)
:Library
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, document.body
and document.createElement
are part of the DOM (Document Object Model), which is a built-in JavaScript API for working with web pages.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses the rest parameter syntax (...Node
) in the first test case, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as part of the standard language specification. This feature allows functions to accept an arbitrary number of arguments using the ...
syntax, making it a concise way to pass multiple values as a single argument.
Other Considerations
The benchmark may also consider other factors such as:
Alternatives
Some alternative benchmarks or test cases might investigate other aspects, such as:
document.createElement('div')
vs. new DOMElement('div')
)push()
method and the append()
methodKeep in mind that these alternatives would depend on the specific goals and focus of the benchmark.