var gender = "Male"
return gender.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + gender.slice(1);
return gender.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + gender.substring(1);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 1818192.5 Ops/sec |
substring | 1743022.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
What is being tested?
The test measures the performance of two different ways to extract characters from a string: slice()
and substring()
. The benchmark is comparing these two approaches, specifically when used on a fixed input string ("Male"
).
Options compared
There are two options being compared:
slice()
: This method returns a new string that includes all the characters of the original string, excluding the specified start index.substring()
: This method returns a new string that includes all the characters of the original string, starting from the specified start index and ending at the specified end index.Pros and cons
Here's a brief summary:
slice()
: Pros:substring()
does.substring()
: Pros:Other considerations
When using slice()
or substring()
, you should also consider the following:
slice()
and substring()
seems to be significant.Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON benchmark. However, it's worth noting that if you're using a library like Lodash or underscore.js, which provide implementations of slice()
and substring()
, their optimizations might affect the results of this benchmark.
Special JS features or syntax
The only special feature being tested here is the use of these two methods to extract characters from a string. There are no other special features or syntaxes being used in the test cases.