a = ['one', 'two', 'three', 'four'];
b = a.reverse();
a = ['one', 'two', 'three', 'four'];
var i=0, len=a.length, j=len-1;
var k, tmp, mid=len/2|0; // same as Math.floor
for (; i < mid; i++) {
tmp = a[i];
k = j - i;
a[i] = a[k];
a[k] = tmp;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
native reverse | |
costume |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
native reverse | 626267.7 Ops/sec |
costume | 230538.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definitions and test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The reverseArray
benchmark definition is essentially two JavaScript functions that implement array reversal:
reverse()
method, which reverses the order of elements in an array."costume"
): This implementation manually iterates over half of the array and swaps elements from both ends to reverse it.Options Compared
In this benchmark, two approaches are compared:
reverse()
method."costume"
):Library and Special JS Features
In this benchmark, there are no libraries used. Additionally, JavaScript's built-in reverse()
method is used in the native reverse implementation, which leverages a low-level optimization technique to implement array reversal efficiently.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors:
reverse()
might be faster for most use cases. Custom implementations can help illustrate performance characteristics, but may not be as efficient."costume"
) can provide valuable insights into array reversal techniques, making it a useful educational tool.Alternatives
Other alternatives for implementing array reversal could include:
array.prototype.slice()
and concatenating arrays in reverse order.However, for this specific benchmark, the focus is on comparing native reverse()
method with a custom implementation ("costume"
).