var one = { a: 123, b: null }
var two = { a: 123, b: undefined }
var three = {a: 123}
one.b == null
one.b != null
two.b == null
two.b != null
three.b == null
three.b != null
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
explicit null check | |
explicit null non-check | |
explicit undefined check | |
explicit undefined non-check | |
implicit undefined check | |
implicit undefined non-check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
explicit null check | 8517670.0 Ops/sec |
explicit null non-check | 8507424.0 Ops/sec |
explicit undefined check | 8685057.0 Ops/sec |
explicit undefined non-check | 8519780.0 Ops/sec |
implicit undefined check | 8487093.0 Ops/sec |
implicit undefined non-check | 8399708.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of JavaScript in comparing null
and undefined
values. The test case is set up by creating three objects, one
, two
, and three
, each with a property b
. Two of these properties are initialized to null
or undefined
, while the third is not.
Options Compared
There are four different approaches to compare null
and undefined
values:
==
operator to explicitly compare one.b
with null
.!=
operator to explicitly exclude null
from the comparison.undefined
values, as they cannot be compared directly to other values.undefined
comparisons.Pros and Cons
undefined
comparisons, reducing overhead.Library Usage
In this benchmark, no specific library is used that would impact the comparison logic directly. However, it's essential to note that some JavaScript engines or libraries might use optimizations or special cases for undefined
comparisons.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no explicit references to special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives to compare null
and undefined
values include:
===
operator with a guard clause to check if one.b
is not null before comparing it.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional complexity and may not always provide better performance than the optimized approaches.