Benchmark: multi-condition - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

function _if(x){return x === 'foo' || x === 'bar'}
function _get(x){return {foo: 1, bar: 1}[x] || false}
function _in(x){return x in {foo: 1, bar: 1}}
function _has(x){return ['foo','bar'].includes(x)}
function _reg(x){return /(foo|bar)/.test(x)}

Tests:

condition
_if('nope'); _if('bar');
property fallback
_get('nope'); _get('bar');
IN
_in('nope'); _in('bar');
Array Includes
_has('nope'); _has('bar');
regex
_reg('nope'); _reg('bar');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
condition
property fallback
IN
Array Includes
regex

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.54 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 95 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
condition	6276243.0 Ops/sec
property fallback	4955542.0 Ops/sec
IN	3850385.0 Ops/sec
Array Includes	5169316.0 Ops/sec
regex	4055580.0 Ops/sec

multi-condition (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: condition vs property fallback vs IN vs Array Includes vs regex

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

condition

property fallback

IN

Array Includes

regex

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A