<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/deepmerge@4.2.2/dist/cjs.min.js'></script>
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } };
var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } };
var c = _.merge({}, a, b);
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } };
var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } };
var c = deepmerge({}, a, b);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash merge | |
deepmerge |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash merge | 207115.8 Ops/sec |
deepmerge | 431490.7 Ops/sec |
I'll dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark compares the performance of two library functions, lodash.merge
and deepmerge
, for merging objects with nested structures.
Library Overview
Lodash: Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library developed by Yehuda Katz. It provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, such as array manipulation, object creation, and functional programming. In this benchmark, the _
symbol is used to refer to the Lodash library.
Deepmerge: Deepmerge is another JavaScript library specifically designed for deep merging objects. Its primary purpose is to merge two or more objects with nested structures in a predictable and efficient manner.
Benchmark Comparison
The benchmark compares the performance of lodash.merge
and deepmerge
when merging two objects, a
and b
, which have nested structures. The test cases are identical for both functions:
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } };
var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } };
var c = _.merge({}, a, b);
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', c: { a: 'a', b: { c: 'c' } } };
var b = { c: { b: { d: 'a' }, c: { d: 'd' } } };
var c = deepmerge({}, a, b);
Options Compared
Both lodash.merge
and deepmerge
offer different options for customizing the merge process. These options are not explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
However, we can infer that these libraries provide some form of optionality, such as:
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons for each library:
Lodash.merge
Deepmerge
Other Considerations
When choosing between lodash.merge
and deepmerge
, consider the specific requirements of your project:
Keep in mind that these libraries are designed to solve different problems. It's essential to evaluate their trade-offs and choose the best fit for your specific needs.
Alternatives
Other alternatives to lodash.merge
and deepmerge
include:
Each of these alternatives has its strengths and weaknesses, so it's crucial to evaluate them based on your specific requirements.