var string = ' fsajdf ,asdfjosa , fjoiawejf, oawjfoei ,jaosdjfsdjfo, sfjos, 2324234 , sdf, safjao , j, o , sdlfks,dflks ,l '
string.replace(/\s/g, '').split(',')
string.split(',').map(str => str.trim())
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex | |
trim |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex | 428604.3 Ops/sec |
trim | 2038919.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents two test cases: regex
and trim
. Both tests aim to measure the performance difference between using regular expressions (regex) versus trimming strings in JavaScript.
Options compared:
replace()
method with a regex pattern to remove whitespace characters (\\s
) from the string.trim()
method to remove whitespace characters from both ends of the string.Pros and Cons:
Regex approach:
Pros:
replace()
or match()
, for more complex text processing.Cons:
trim()
method due to its overhead.Trim approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Other considerations:
executionsPerSecond
value indicates that Chrome 94 executed each test case more than 2 million times per second.Library usage:
Neither of the provided benchmarks uses any external libraries. The trim()
method is a built-in JavaScript function, and regex patterns are simply strings that can be used with various methods (e.g., replace()
, match()
).
Special JS features or syntax:
None mentioned in this benchmark.
Alternatives:
For similar microbenchmarks, you might want to try:
split()
, join()
, or substring()
.To prepare a new benchmark, you can use the following steps:
trim()
method (or other built-in functions).Feel free to ask if you have any further questions!