var appState = "active";
var regex = /inactive|background/;
var arr = ['inactive', 'background'];
regex.test(appState);
arr.includes(appState);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
RegEx.test | |
Array.includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
RegEx.test | 74987280.0 Ops/sec |
Array.includes | 105578888.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The test measures the performance difference between two approaches: using regular expressions (regex) with test()
function and using array methods (includes()
).
Options being compared:
test()
: This approach uses a regex pattern to match against the input string appState
. The test()
method returns a boolean value indicating whether the pattern matches.includes()
: This approach checks if the input string appState
is included in the array arr
.Pros and Cons of each approach:
test()
:includes()
:In general, regex can be more powerful but also slower due to the overhead of compiling and executing the pattern. Array methods are often faster and more lightweight, but may not offer the same level of flexibility as regex.
Library used in the test case:
None, this benchmark does not use any external libraries.
Special JS feature or syntax used:
There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark, as it only relies on standard JavaScript functionality.