Benchmark: Array concat speed

Tests:

Array.prototype.concat
var testArray = [29, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63]; var other = [].concat(testArray);
spread operator
var testArray = [29, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63]; var other = [ ...testArray ]
Push
var testArray = [29, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63]; var other = [].push(...testArray);
Object assign
var testArray = [29, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63]; var other = Object.assign([], testArray);
For loop
var testArray = [29, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63, 27, 28, 838, 22, 2882, 2, 93, 84, 74, 7, 933, 3754, 3874, 22838, 38464, 3837, 82424, 2927, 2625, 63]; var other = [] for (let i = 0; i < testArray.length; i++){ other.push(testArray[i]) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Push
Object assign
For loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It looks like you've provided two pieces of data: a benchmarking result and some code snippets.

The benchmarking result is in the format expected by BenchmarkJS, which allows for the comparison of different JavaScript implementations (e.g., V8, SpiderMonkey) to determine which one performs better on a given test case.

Here's a breakdown of the benchmark result:

1. **RawUAString**: The user agent string returned by the browser.
2. **Browser**: The name and version of the browser being used.
3. **DevicePlatform**: The type of device being used (in this case, desktop).
4. **OperatingSystem**: The operating system being used (in this case, Mac OS X 10.15.7).
5. **ExecutionsPerSecond**: A measure of how many iterations of the test were performed per second.
6. **TestName**: The name of the benchmarking test.

The code snippets appear to be examples of different ways to perform a simple operation:

1. **spread operator**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to expand an array into separate arguments.
2. **Array.prototype.concat()**: Using the `concat()` method to concatenate two arrays.
3. **For loop**: Using a traditional `for` loop to iterate over an array and push each element onto another array.
4. **Push**: Using the `push()` method to add elements to an array.

Without more context or information about what these tests are intended to measure, it's difficult to provide further insights. However, if you'd like to discuss the results of these benchmarks or explore possible optimizations for your specific use case, I'm here to help!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 15 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.prototype.concat	6634676.5 Ops/sec
spread operator	172887280.0 Ops/sec
Push	902485.1 Ops/sec
Object assign	141654.3 Ops/sec
For loop	2030185.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array concat speed (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs Push vs Object assign vs For loop

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.prototype.concat

spread operator

Push

Object assign

For loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):