Benchmark: Some vs Filter vs indexOf vs Includes vs Find (2)

Script Preparation code:

var hasZero = [];
var withoutZero = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000));
  withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1)
}

Tests:

Array.some
hasZero.some(v => v === 0)
Array.filter
hasZero.filter(v => v === 0)
Array.indexOf
hasZero.indexOf(0) > -1
Array.includes
hasZero.includes(0)
Array.find
hasZero.find(v => v === 0)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.some
Array.filter
Array.indexOf
Array.includes
Array.find

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/94.0.4606.81 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 94 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.some	498494.5 Ops/sec
Array.filter	30219.5 Ops/sec
Array.indexOf	393818.4 Ops/sec
Array.includes	17510070.0 Ops/sec
Array.find	505914.4 Ops/sec

Some vs Filter vs indexOf vs Includes vs Find (2) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array.some vs Array.filter vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Array.find

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.some

Array.filter

Array.indexOf

Array.includes

Array.find

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A