Benchmark: Set.has vs Array.includes (dependent on n)

Set.has vs Array.includes (dependent on n) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: includes (n = 1) vs has (n = 1) vs includes (n = 10) vs has (n = 10) vs includes (n = 100) vs has (n = 100) vs includes (n = 1000) vs has (n = 1000) vs includes (n = 10000) vs has (n = 10000) vs includes (n = 100000) vs has (n = 100000) vs includes (n = 1000000) vs has (n = 1000000) vs includes (n = 10000000) vs has (n = 10000000)

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Script Preparation code:

const nValues = [1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000, 1000000, 10000000]
var dataSets = Object.fromEntries(nValues.map(n => {
	const array = new Array(n).fill(0)
	array[n-1] = 1
	return [n, {array, set: new Set(array)}]
}))

Tests:

includes (n = 1)
dataSets['1'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 1)
dataSets['1'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 10)
dataSets['10'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 10)
dataSets['10'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 100)
dataSets['100'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 100)
dataSets['100'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 1000)
dataSets['1000'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 1000)
dataSets['1000'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 10000)
dataSets['10000'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 10000)
dataSets['10000'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 100000)
dataSets['100000'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 100000)
dataSets['100000'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 1000000)
dataSets['1000000'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 1000000)
dataSets['1000000'].set.has(1)
includes (n = 10000000)
dataSets['10000000'].array.includes(1)
has (n = 10000000)
dataSets['10000000'].set.has(1)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes (n = 1)
has (n = 1)
includes (n = 10)
has (n = 10)
includes (n = 100)
has (n = 100)
includes (n = 1000)
has (n = 1000)
includes (n = 10000)
has (n = 10000)
includes (n = 100000)
has (n = 100000)
includes (n = 1000000)
has (n = 1000000)
includes (n = 10000000)
has (n = 10000000)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/94.0.4606.61 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 94 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
includes (n = 1)	11504020.0 Ops/sec
has (n = 1)	10515090.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 10)	11674940.0 Ops/sec
has (n = 10)	10465110.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 100)	11499260.0 Ops/sec
has (n = 100)	10505310.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 1000)	11695290.0 Ops/sec
has (n = 1000)	10576320.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 10000)	3952693.0 Ops/sec
has (n = 10000)	10511470.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 100000)	43174.1 Ops/sec
has (n = 100000)	10638700.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 1000000)	901.2 Ops/sec
has (n = 1000000)	9138264.0 Ops/sec
includes (n = 10000000)	86.3 Ops/sec
has (n = 10000000)	8348866.0 Ops/sec

Set.has vs Array.includes (dependent on n) (version: 0)

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

includes (n = 1)

has (n = 1)

includes (n = 10)

has (n = 10)

includes (n = 100)

has (n = 100)

includes (n = 1000)

has (n = 1000)

includes (n = 10000)

has (n = 10000)

includes (n = 100000)

has (n = 100000)

includes (n = 1000000)

has (n = 1000000)

includes (n = 10000000)

has (n = 10000000)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A